<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>House of the rising Moonglum &#187; News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/category/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog</link>
	<description>I told him I'd give him whatfor!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 01:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sadr City Perspective</title>
		<link>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/12/18/sadr-city-perspective/</link>
		<comments>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/12/18/sadr-city-perspective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moonglum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/?p=1703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#8217;t done an Iraq post in a while.  Many of the Iraqi blogs I read have slowed down, but with the elections coming up, a few of them have picked up a little.  In particular, IraqPundit is going around getting a bunch of different viewpoints on the state of the country and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t done an Iraq post in a while.  Many of the Iraqi blogs I read have slowed down, but with the elections coming up, a few of them have picked up a little.  In particular, IraqPundit is going around getting a bunch of different viewpoints on the state of the country and the upcoming elections.  What I want to know is, why are the <a href="http://iraqpundit.blogspot.com/2009/12/sadr-city-perspective.html">day laborers from the poor part of Baghdad</a> the ones opinions I agree most with.  &#8220;The men said they had no respect for &#8216;the thieves&#8217; in parliament, as they called them. All of them? All of them, they said.&#8221;  I guess it&#8217;s because I live in Chicago.  s/Parliament/City Council/  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m just hoping and praying that the violence doesn&#8217;t pick up too much before the election to really interfere with it.  I think an election with less of a visible US troop presence will be able to have a lot more support from the general public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/12/18/sadr-city-perspective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives For The Constitution</title>
		<link>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/11/18/conservatives-for-the-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/11/18/conservatives-for-the-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moonglum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/?p=1697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, thank you.  I hate to agree with Grover Norquist, but I do love intellectual consistency.  If this group of über-conservatives can see the light on the Gitmo detainees, hopefully more will follow.  I know I am asking a lot here, but you never know.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, thank you.  I hate to agree with Grover Norquist, but I do love intellectual consistency.  If this group of über-conservatives can <a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/documents/2009/11/a-letter-from-bob-barr-david-keene-and-grover-norquist-on-trying-911-suspects-in-us.php?page=1">see the light on the Gitmo detainees</a>, hopefully more will follow.  I know I am asking a lot here, but you never know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/11/18/conservatives-for-the-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bring Gitmo To Illinois</title>
		<link>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/11/14/bring-gitmo-to-illinois/</link>
		<comments>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/11/14/bring-gitmo-to-illinois/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 04:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moonglum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/?p=1695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear President Obama,
As a citizen of the state of Illinois, home to Abraham Lincoln, I would be proud to accept any and all prisoners from our current conflicts in Illinois prisons.  For too long our country has operated outside the rule of law with respect to those who have wronged us.  We have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear President Obama,</p>
<p>As a citizen of the state of Illinois, home to Abraham Lincoln, I would be proud to <a href="http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2009/11/illinois-the-next-gitmo.html">accept any and all prisoners from our current conflicts in Illinois prisons</a>.  For too long our country has operated outside the rule of law with respect to those who have wronged us.  We have laws in place with which to punish them, and if we ever hope to regain the trust of the world we must use them.  The first step is to find a place within the bounds of the US to house our most dangerous criminals, and we have at our disposal an empty maximum security prison.  The citizens of that town <a href="http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2009/11/ill-town-optimistic-about-arrival-of-gitmo-detainees.html">seem happy to help out</a>.  Once in place we can bring them to trial and finally have justice done.  This country has waited for too long, and the rest of the world begins to doubt our sincerity.</p>
<p>Thank you for your attention in this matter,</p>
<p>Moonglum</p>
<p>p.s. Ignore Mark Kirk, he seems to prefer keeping one prison empty while the rest are overcrowded, when opening this one, while providing local jobs could also relieve some of the overcrowding in the rest of the prisons in Illinois.  How this reduces our safety I have no idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/11/14/bring-gitmo-to-illinois/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Largest Procurement Cuts In Decades</title>
		<link>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/10/28/largest-procurement-cuts-in-decades/</link>
		<comments>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/10/28/largest-procurement-cuts-in-decades/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moonglum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/?p=1684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama used some good timing to shift a lot of spending from long range Procurement and Development to cheaper and more effective and near term projects in the current Defense budget.  I don&#8217;t know how much chance he has to follow up on this moving forward, but making defense spending leaner and aiming at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama used some good timing to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/29/business/29defense.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss">shift a lot of spending from long range Procurement and Development to cheaper and more effective and near term projects</a> in the current Defense budget.  I don&#8217;t know how much chance he has to follow up on this moving forward, but making defense spending leaner and aiming at more bang for the buck in terms of high tech projects seems like a really good idea.</p>
<p>My favorite item though?  Mr. Obama has also threatened to veto any attempts to salvage an early version of a new presidential helicopter that the administration canceled.  That&#8217;s walking the walk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/10/28/largest-procurement-cuts-in-decades/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Cancels Missile Defense</title>
		<link>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/09/17/obama-cancels-missile-defense/</link>
		<comments>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/09/17/obama-cancels-missile-defense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moonglum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/?p=1661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THe Globe and Mail (among others) is reporting that Obama has canceled the missile defense systems that were going into eastern Europe, while at the same time getting concessions from Russia on the war in Afghanistan.  I would love to hear from my more wonkish friends on what they think the repercussions of this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THe Globe and Mail (among others) is reporting that <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/obama-cancels-missile-defence-and-changes-everything/article1292073/">Obama has canceled the missile defense systems that were going into eastern Europe</a>, while at the same time getting concessions from Russia on the war in Afghanistan.  I would love to hear from my more wonkish friends on what they think the repercussions of this will be.  I, personally, have never believed that a late-boost/mid-range missile defense system would be viable anyway, but many of my friends have held the opinion that the purpose of the system wasn&#8217;t to defend against rogue states with ICBMs, but to cement out relationship to Eastern Europe and require us to come to their aid in the case of Russian aggression.  The Globe and Mail article certainly suggests that.  <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0917/p02s13-usfp.html">The Christian Science Monitor</a> thinks it is just a cost benefit analysis.  And while it is nice to see us trying to work with Russia instead of just antagonizing them, it also seems like cutting it off could have been done with a bit more grace.  They both noted that picking the anniversary of the Soviet invasion of Poland for the announcement was poor.</p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/09/17/obama-cancels-missile-defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama and Racism</title>
		<link>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/09/17/obama-and-racism/</link>
		<comments>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/09/17/obama-and-racism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moonglum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/?p=1657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had a friend recently send me a pajamas media video that was supposedly about Obama&#8217;s Iconography and Branding.  I have been thinking a lot lately about where the whole Obama as Hitler thing is coming from, and had been leaning towards racism, but couldn&#8217;t figure out exactly why.  (And no, not just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a friend recently send me a pajamas media video that was supposedly about <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdtqtfXdR-c">Obama&#8217;s Iconography and Branding</a>.  I have been thinking a lot lately about where the whole Obama as Hitler thing is coming from, and had been leaning towards racism, but couldn&#8217;t figure out exactly why.  (And no, not just Carter.)  Basically I&#8217;m trying to figure out what is different between this and the far left <a href="http://semiskimmed.net/bushhitler.html">saying the same thing about Bush</a> for the past 8 years.  This video helped me figure some of it out.  &#8220;Never seen before&#8221;  &#8220;Perpetual leadership&#8221;  &#8220;Only seen in totalitarian regimes&#8221;  &#8220;I won&#8217;t show them because it would be obscene to compare the horror they generated, 150,000,000 dead no less, to what&#8217;s going on here today.  That was mass murder this is merely advertising.  We&#8217;ve just never seen that kind of thing before here in america.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but if this guy is an ad expert and an iconography expert he knows exactly what he is doing, and it is playing on the base fear of the &#8220;other&#8221;.  He is &#8220;different&#8221;.  He is not like what has gone before _in this country_.  He is _not us_.  This video has nothing to do with iconography, and is full of misdirections and lies.  The W disappeared for four years?  Please.  The DNC isn&#8217;t using the presidential seal?  That&#8217;s because it is <a href="http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/713.html">ILLEGAL</a> to use it for anything other than official government business.  The eagle is flying away?  The eagle is ALWAYS flying, for the same reason that the donkey is kicking, it makes the icon more active and exciting.  Heck, it&#8217;s flying away in _the presidential seal_ as well!</p>
<p>As for the O icon continuing to be promulgated, every official speech the president has done has had the presidential seal on the podium.  His weekly podcasts used to be branded with the O, but the day he became president they were rebranded with the presidential seal.  This iconography argument is a thin veneer for trying to brand the president a different from all the others, and different from us.  And that is where my fear for the racial thing comes in.</p>
<p>I hated George Bush, but at the end of the day he was my president.  (If anything the argument against him was that he was _too much_ like us.)  This line of thinking and talking is what is driving the far right to &#8220;mobilize for action&#8221;.  This causes people to yell at the town halls and show up with guns at Obama&#8217;s speeches.  By painting him as on par with the epitome of evil, the right is slowly building up the idea that <a href="http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/cspanjunkie/why-i-hate-barack-obama-pastor-steven">ANYTHING</a> is acceptable in opposition to him.  This iconography video is just more of the same.  Sarah Palin&#8217;s death panels and Rush Limbaugh saying he has brown shirts.  That crazy Baptist saying it&#8217;s OK to kill Obama because he supports abortion.  Right wing (birther) blogs say that he <a href="http://fredshelm.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/barack-the-black-hitler/">actually is hitler and is going to round up and kill 6,000,000 jews</a>.  People showing up in town hall meetings, or filling up message boards with Obama and Hitler comparisons when the rest of us are trying to talk about healthcare.  This causes me to turn into a knee-jerk liberal.</p>
<p>Which is really frustrating, because there is actual discussion that I would like to be able to have about things like economic reform and healthcare reform.  Important questions, like what would a public option mean?  How would it operate?  And if we don&#8217;t have one, how can we guarantee that the health insurance companies can&#8217;t go on abusing the middle class like they already have been?  And if we decide that everyone should have health care, how are we going to get the 40,000,000 people who aren&#8217;t covered, covered without a public option?  But when I go to a town hall meeting, or a website, and someone comes out with &#8220;Obama is Hitler!&#8221; it makes me immediately jump to his defense.  Because at the end of the day, even though I may disagree with him on some items, like George Bush, he is my president.  And that path leads to the end of social discourse.  </p>
<p>And I think that is where the difference lies.  It feels (to me) like it was easier to have discussions about the ramifications of Bush actions than it is about Obama actions.  I suppose it could just be that he is actively trying to be more accessible, and thus the conversation is similarly louder.  For example, there weren&#8217;t any town halls on the decision to invade Iraq, but the probably would have been pretty tense if there were.  But a final note is that Obama <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/5967942/Barack-Obama-faces-30-death-threats-a-day-stretching-US-Secret-Service.html">gets four times the death threats</a> than Bush did.  It just seems unlikely that that comes from policy differences alone.  I find it hard to believe that more people are violently opposed to health care than to torture.  And much easier to believe that a general culture of hate and painting the black president as different from us has a lot more to do with it.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/09/17/obama-and-racism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Takes On Palin&#8217;s Resignation</title>
		<link>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/07/29/two-takes-on-palins-resignation/</link>
		<comments>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/07/29/two-takes-on-palins-resignation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moonglum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/?p=1621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just got back from Alaska, where it was pretty hard to find any Palin merchandise.  There were actually some pretty good pro-Palin news stories on why it is a good idea for her to step down, even if you believe in her (for local Alaska political reasons, not personal or national political reasons).  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got back from Alaska, where it was pretty hard to find any Palin merchandise.  There were actually some pretty good pro-Palin news stories on why it is a good idea for her to step down, even if you believe in her (for local Alaska political reasons, not personal or national political reasons).  And this is a good thing, because her actual resignation speech was incomprehensible.  I present for your enjoyment, two attempts to fix up her speech a little bit.  First, <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2009/07/palin-speech-edit-200907">the editors over at Vanity Fair give it a go</a>.  Pretty useful comments in there, which actually turn it into a pretty good speech.</p>
<p>Second, and by far my favorite, is a &#8220;reading&#8221; of the beat poem that is Palin&#8217;s speech, as read by William Shatner.  Oh yeah.</p>
<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://widgets.nbc.com/o/4727a250e66f9723/4a6fcf8ea82cda69/4a6eee2025de7ae0/98457c21/-cpid/6c71526ec4132de2" id="W4727a250e66f97234a6fcf8ea82cda69" width="384" height="283"><param name="movie" value="http://widgets.nbc.com/o/4727a250e66f9723/4a6fcf8ea82cda69/4a6eee2025de7ae0/98457c21/-cpid/6c71526ec4132de2" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="all" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/07/29/two-takes-on-palins-resignation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kurds Still Want Own Country</title>
		<link>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/07/10/kurds-still-want-own-country/</link>
		<comments>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/07/10/kurds-still-want-own-country/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moonglum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/?p=1609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unsurprisingly the Kurds updated their own constitution and laid claim to all the land and oil in the north of Iraq.  I would like to believe that this is just a negotiating tactic for getting a better deal with the central government, but that would ignore a thousand years of history.  What are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unsurprisingly the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/10/world/middleeast/10kurds.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss">Kurds updated their own constitution and laid claim to all the land and oil in the north of Iraq</a>.  I would like to believe that this is just a negotiating tactic for getting a better deal with the central government, but that would ignore a thousand years of history.  What are we doing still messing around in countries with thousands of years of history that we will never understand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/07/10/kurds-still-want-own-country/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Risks National Security?</title>
		<link>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/04/19/obama-risks-national-security/</link>
		<comments>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/04/19/obama-risks-national-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moonglum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/?p=1583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really do wonder how much secrecy is necessary in a democracy.  Really, I mean that.  If we are expected to be able to vote for the people who are going to make the best decisions, how are we going to know who that is when we don&#8217;t know what decisions they are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really do wonder how much secrecy is necessary in a democracy.  Really, I mean that.  If we are expected to be able to vote for the people who are going to make the best decisions, how are we going to know who that is when we don&#8217;t know what decisions they are making?  </p>
<p>So it appears that someone who just lost his job is complaining that <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/19/cia.torture.chief/index.html">telling the truth risks national security</a>.  Really?  All this sounds like is sour grapes.  He should just be thankful that Obama isn&#8217;t charging anyone for crimes committed.  </p>
<p>I understand that some secrets are needed, but I really do fear when every little item is classified for &#8220;national security&#8221;.  And Obama is just continuing this trend with (thankfully at least) a few exceptions.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/04/19/obama-risks-national-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More EPA News</title>
		<link>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/04/14/more-epa-news/</link>
		<comments>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/04/14/more-epa-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moonglum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicken Little]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/?p=1581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yet another article showing the progress the EPA is making.  I can&#8217;t say what a breath of fresh air this is.  I don&#8217;t know how much of this will actually pan out into policies that are good for our national viability and the environment, but it is nice to see it being talked [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another article <a href="http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/energy/2009/04/09/a-revived-epa-takes-on-climate-change-and-more.html">showing the progress the EPA is making</a>.  I can&#8217;t say what a breath of fresh air this is.  I don&#8217;t know how much of this will actually pan out into policies that are good for our national viability and the environment, but it is nice to see it being talked about at the very least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/04/14/more-epa-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
