<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>House of the rising Moonglum &#187; Meow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/category/meow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog</link>
	<description>I told him I'd give him whatfor!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 01:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Microsoft Releases New Secure Transaction Framework</title>
		<link>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2010/03/04/microsoft-releases-new-secure-transaction-framework/</link>
		<comments>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2010/03/04/microsoft-releases-new-secure-transaction-framework/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moonglum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Meow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/?p=1717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really like the idea that some clever cryptographic trick can ensure our privacy, but I&#8217;m afraid that Microsoft&#8217;s new technology won&#8217;t do the trick.  The article points out the obvious reasons why companies don&#8217;t actually want you to have privacy (they want to be able to have a continuing relationship with their customers) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the idea that some clever cryptographic trick can ensure our privacy, but I&#8217;m afraid that <a href="http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2010/03/microsoft-open-sources-clever-u-prove-identity-framework.ars">Microsoft&#8217;s new technology</a> won&#8217;t do the trick.  The article points out the obvious reasons why companies don&#8217;t actually want you to have privacy (they want to be able to have a continuing relationship with their customers) however there is an interesting technical reason why this won&#8217;t work.  </p>
<p>The fact of the matter is, most people have very obvious usage patterns that can be tracked across login sessions.  In order to get useful information out of a transaction, the vendor doesn&#8217;t need to actually know your private details.  If they know that &#8220;computer A&#8221; bought x, y, and z products, then they have a pretty good model of who the user of &#8220;computer A&#8221; is, even without having a name and address.  Then the next time &#8220;computer A&#8221; logs in to do some shopping at their web site, the vendor can splash the appropriate ads across the screen.  I think the real trick here is the ability to fund transactions without giving actual funding source information to the vendor.  They will still know who you have as your credit card vendor of course, but at least they won&#8217;t be storing your card number on their server to have it stolen.  And this is what the Microsoft <a href="https://connect.microsoft.com/content/content.aspx?contentid=12505&#038;siteid=642">technical information</a> mostly talks about, but everything I have read on the web is talking about &#8220;privacy&#8221;, which seems like it will kill it for all the wrong reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2010/03/04/microsoft-releases-new-secure-transaction-framework/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confusion Over What iPad Is</title>
		<link>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2010/01/30/confusion-over-what-ipad-is/</link>
		<comments>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2010/01/30/confusion-over-what-ipad-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moonglum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Meow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/?p=1708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, apple just came out with a new toy and a lot of people have been asking me my opinion of it.  In particular, they have been citing a number of reviews that claim to know what it is all about.  Many reviews are complaining about what it isn&#8217;t rather than focusing on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, apple just came out with <a href="http://www.apple.com/ipad/">a new toy</a> and a lot of people have been asking me my opinion of it.  In particular, they have been citing a number of reviews that claim to know what it is all about.  Many reviews are complaining about what it isn&#8217;t rather than focusing on what it is.  People are complaining about the fact that it <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5458382/8-things-that-suck-about-the-ipad">doesn&#8217;t have all the bells and whistles</a> and that it <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2010/01/27/whats-missing-from-the-ipad/">is missing features you need to work</a>.  </p>
<p>Basically the main complaints I have heard are &#8220;it&#8217;s not an iPhone&#8221; and &#8220;it&#8217;s not a laptop&#8221;.  Yes, that is true.  If you want to work at the corner coffee shop, you still need a laptop.  If you want the internet anywhere, you still need an iPhone.  However, if you want the internet in your living room, then this is for you.  This is the real way to surf.  You don&#8217;t need a keyboard to surf.  You don&#8217;t need 3G access in your living room.  You don&#8217;t need a camera or multi tasking or any of those things.  You do need a pretty powerful CPU, which is provided.  And if you are really spending some time on the net, instead of just looking something up, you need a big screen.  Which the iPad has.  This is the internet on your coffee table.  </p>
<p>Will it kill the kindle?  Perhaps, but that is not the point.  Will it replace laptops?  No, it is not a device to get work done on, though you can do a little if you need to.  (The one exception to that might be giving slide presentations, but I really think that a laptop is still a better platform for that.)  And finally, the iPhone is the perfect form factor for a phone, so I have no idea why people think that this would even try to replace that.  The <a href="http://blog.macsales.com/3932-the-apple-ipad-casual-home-computing-untethered">best review I saw</a> called it the beginning of &#8220;casual computing&#8221;.  That seems correct to me.</p>
<p>Long term, probably the most interesting sign of the future is actually the chip inside it.  An independent retailer designing their own chip?  I have no idea where that is going to lead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2010/01/30/confusion-over-what-ipad-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iFixit Manuals Now Open Source</title>
		<link>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/12/17/ifixit-manuals-now-open-source/</link>
		<comments>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/12/17/ifixit-manuals-now-open-source/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 03:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moonglum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chicken Little]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Me]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/?p=1700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is awesome.  iFixit just released all their (awesome IMO) manuals as open source.  Now we all have free access to this incredible resource.  I have used them for years, and only last year got rid of my Pismo, thanks to their manuals.  That thing have every single items except for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is awesome.  iFixit just released all their (awesome IMO) <a href="http://www.ifixit.com/blog/?p=2023">manuals as open source</a>.  Now we all have free access to this incredible resource.  I have used them for years, and only last year got rid of my Pismo, thanks to their manuals.  That thing have every single items except for the case replaced or repaired, up to and including the <a href="http://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Repair/Installing-PowerBook-G3-Pismo-Display/30/1">display</a> and <a href="http://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Repair/Installing-PowerBook-G3-Pismo-Inverter/29/1">inverter</a>.  Given that I work in the industry I probably hold on to my tech too long, but it does make me feel like I am at least doing a small part for the planet, not junking it up with more rapid upgrade cycles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/12/17/ifixit-manuals-now-open-source/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OMG OKCD</title>
		<link>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/10/26/omg-okcd/</link>
		<comments>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/10/26/omg-okcd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moonglum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/?p=1680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In honor of GeoCities shutting down xkcd redesigned their web site.  It is like a horrible, bleeding eye, walk down memory lane.  Absolutely wonderful.  From the broken image links, to the horrible arrow buttons; scrolling text to the blinking (actually not&#8230; some things have improved over the years).  Ridiculous precision on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In honor of GeoCities shutting down xkcd <a href="http://xkcd.com/">redesigned their web site</a>.  It is like a horrible, bleeding eye, walk down memory lane.  Absolutely wonderful.  From the broken image links, to the horrible arrow buttons; scrolling text to the blinking (actually not&#8230; some things have improved over the years).  Ridiculous precision on the page hits.  Random bits of CGI sprayed over the page.  </p>
<p>So horribly wrongly wonderful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/10/26/omg-okcd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Chicago Overlay</title>
		<link>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/10/06/new-chicago-overlay/</link>
		<comments>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/10/06/new-chicago-overlay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moonglum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/?p=1671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Useful tip for Chicago residents: start dialing 1 + ten numbers.  
We are getting a new overlay area code in the 773 (and surrounding) areas.  This means that starting November 9th, we all need to dial 1 + area code + phone number for ALL phone calls, even if they are still in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Useful tip for Chicago residents: start dialing 1 + ten numbers.  </p>
<p>We are getting a new overlay area code in the 773 (and surrounding) areas.  This means that starting November 9th, we all need to <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-icc-pdf,0,4054970.htmlpage">dial 1 + area code + phone number for ALL phone calls</a>, even if they are still in the same area code that your number is.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/10/06/new-chicago-overlay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 Party (NSFW)</title>
		<link>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/09/25/windows-7-party-nsfw/</link>
		<comments>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/09/25/windows-7-party-nsfw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moonglum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/?p=1668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey all.  You may or may not have seen the video that Microsoft put out that gives you tips for hosting your own Windows 7 party.  
Suffice it to say, it is horrible.  I mean I love technology, and in fact salivate over new operating systems, but the notion of having an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey all.  You may or may not have seen the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cX4t5-YpHQ">video that Microsoft put out</a> that gives you tips for hosting your own Windows 7 party.  </p>
<p>Suffice it to say, it is horrible.  I mean I love technology, and in fact salivate over new operating systems, but the notion of having an operating system party just bothers me.  And even worse, with those people.  Fortunately &#8220;Windows 7&#8243; was just code.  With some <a href="http://www.cabel.name/2009/09/windows-7-party.html">minor modifications</a> we know what the part is really about.</p>
<p>Oh my.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/09/25/windows-7-party-nsfw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Answers the FCC’s Questions</title>
		<link>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/08/21/apple-answers-the-fcc%e2%80%99s-questions/</link>
		<comments>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/08/21/apple-answers-the-fcc%e2%80%99s-questions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moonglum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Meow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/?p=1628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow.  They actually posted the answers in public as well.  I was not expecting that.  I don&#8217;t think that this will get the FCC off their back, or make the people who are mad at them happy.  But in general it makes me happy, because it indicates a willingness to talk [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  They actually <a href="http://www.apple.com/hotnews/apple-answers-fcc-questions/">posted the answers in public as well</a>.  I was not expecting that.  I don&#8217;t think that this will get the FCC off their back, or make the people who are mad at them happy.  But in general it makes me happy, because it indicates a willingness to talk about the process at the store, and acknowledges that they are forging new ground here and can be making mistakes.  This gives me hope that they will actually  be able to learn from their mistakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/08/21/apple-answers-the-fcc%e2%80%99s-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snow Leopard Adds Closures To C</title>
		<link>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/08/17/snow-leopard-adds-closures-to-c/</link>
		<comments>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/08/17/snow-leopard-adds-closures-to-c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moonglum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Meow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/?p=1625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OMG, looking through a brief description of Grand Central in Snow Leopard (that is: the multi-core programming tools provided by apple in the next generation of Mac OS X), their description of the implementation of work units (they call them blocks) makes it appear as if they are closures.
&#8220;What’s really powerful about blocks is that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG, looking through a <a href="http://images.apple.com/macosx/technology/docs/GrandCentral_TB_brief_20090608.pdf">brief description of Grand Central</a> in Snow Leopard (that is: the multi-core programming tools provided by apple in the next generation of Mac OS X), their description of the implementation of work units (they call them blocks) makes it appear as if they are closures.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;What’s really powerful about blocks is that they enable you to wrap much more complex functions—as well as their arguments and data—in a way that can be easily passed around in a program, much as a variable can be easily referenced and passed.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Sounds like a closure, no?  Too cool.  Anyone need a mac programmer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/08/17/snow-leopard-adds-closures-to-c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Version Control</title>
		<link>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/05/15/version-control/</link>
		<comments>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/05/15/version-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 02:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moonglum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Meow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/?p=1592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ugh.  I spent an hour today trying to convince a programmer that version control is a good idea.  He had a number of counter arguments, and has me somewhat convinced that he actually is using a version control system.  One that involves filename changing and copying files individually from one computer to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh.  I spent an hour today trying to convince a programmer that version control is a good idea.  He had a number of counter arguments, and has me somewhat convinced that he actually is using a version control system.  One that involves filename changing and copying files individually from one computer to another.  It is unclear to me that he ever understood the advantages of automating that all.  But at least he left saying he&#8217;ll &#8220;think about it&#8221;.</p>
<p>Accountability.  Trivial change lists.  Trivial distribution.  Rollback.  Remote backup.  Remove the fear of rapid development.  </p>
<p>What am I forgetting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/05/15/version-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whitehouse.gov</title>
		<link>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/01/21/whitehousegov/</link>
		<comments>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/01/21/whitehousegov/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moonglum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Meow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/?p=1531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much though I love the new White House web site, the thing that really tickles me is that passes the W3C XHTML validator.  That is actually somewhat difficult to do.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much though I love the new <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/">White House</a> web site, the thing that really tickles me is that <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whitehouse.gov&#038;charset=%28detect+automatically%29&#038;doctype=Inline&#038;group=0">passes the W3C XHTML validator</a>.  That is actually somewhat difficult to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lair.haggisnet.org/~josh/blog/archives/2009/01/21/whitehousegov/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
