I was just reading an article on the Da Vinci Code move, and read two of the more interesting quotes on the whole thing that I have read in a while. The first has to do with Christianity and I think speaks to something of the prevalence of evangelical christianity making more noise than more mainstream groups:
“We are a Jesus-haunted culture that’s biblically illiterate” and harbors general “disaffection from traditional answers.”
Just earlier today I described some fellow Christians as “superstitious”, but I think I like the phrase “Jesus-haunted” better. The problem is combining that with biblical illiteracy and you end up with a bunch of people who think that having faith only requires saying certain words.
The other quote I liked has to do with the difference between fact and fiction:
“Merely because an author describes matters as being factually correct does not mean that they are factually correct. It is a way of blending fact and fiction together to create that well known model ‘faction.’ The lure of apparent genuineness makes the books and the films more receptive to the readers/audiences. The danger of course is that the faction is all that large parts of the audience read, and they accept it as truth.”
I was sitting next to someone on the plane last week who was reading the Da Vinci Code. I loved the book and he clued into that and kept asking me which elements were “true” and which were not. Since I am not an expert on art or architecture I just had to tell him that it was best to assume that most of it was fiction, but based in fact. If there was something he found interesting he was going to have to look it up when he got back. You see, the book isn’t truthful, it is truthy.