So Bush wants to amend the constitution. Why you might ask? Because he thinks that someone is doing something wrong. I’m just so mad about this that I could spit. But I don’t want to rave like a lunatic, so let me pick two things that I think are wrong about this and talk about them. A lot of people have a lot of reasons for not liking this, but I am going to attack it from the religious perspective.
First: Separation of Church and State. Everyone knows that the first amendment protects the freedom of speech, but it also attempts to keep the government’s hands off of religion: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”. People have taken this to mean “Separation of Church and State” but really it is protection for people who were persecuted back home. It is bad enough to have religion inform the decisions that Bush makes about where our country is going, but to have him decide that he knows what it best for religion is certainly against the first amendment! (Of course that could be why he wants an amendment, since anything less (e.g. laws) would probably be struck down by the first amendment.)
In my opinion there are two things: civil union (taxes, rights, etc) and marriage (religious). Unfortunately the United States Code seems to conflate the two pretty regularly. I have a funny feeling that Bush doesn’t. Which means that I think he is trying to legislate religion. And as a side effect take away rights from a segment of the population (one million of whom are Republicans!). But bush is trying to tell the religions what is and is not legal in terms of marriage. And that just doesn’t seem like a good idea.
Second: Making decisions without due consideration. Churches all over the world are currently struggling with these issues (large PDF). My church in particular, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, has put together a commission to study these issues, understand the general feeling, study the biblical texts, study the historical context, and then after six years put together a list of findings and perhaps (I repeat perhaps) put together a statement of the church’s decision on committed homosexual unions. The document I link to tries to be an evenhanded study guide for getting congregations to reason about and discuss emotional issues in such a way that an understanding can be achieved. And it is taking a freaking long time! And bush comes out and in one day decides that this is so bad that we need to legislate it away, as if he is the Pope or something! What if the ELCA decides that gay marriage is ok? Then we are a forbidden religion in the US according to the constitution, because of one quickly formed idea of one man.
On the other hand, maybe he has been spending all of his vacation time thinking about this.